Pin Drop! Expert Claims “FDA-Approved” Pfizer Vaccine Is NOT What People Have Been Getting

(Republican Insider) – The FDA approved the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine this week but one expert in the field is asserting that the vaccine that has been being given to people and is under Emergency Use Authorization and the vaccine that now enjoys “FDA approval” are not the same.

Dr. Robert Malone, inventor of the mRNA technology behind the COVID vaccines, spoke with Steve Bannon, host of the popular podcast the War Room, and said that the FDA approved shot and the EUA shot are not one in the same.

Bannon asked, is the “authorized” vaccine now ready to be administered to patients?

“It’s absolutely not available,” Malone explained. “The little trick that they’ve done here is that they’ve issued two letters, separate letters for two separate vaccines. The Pfizer vaccine which is what is currently available, is still under emergency use authorization, and it still has the liability shield.”

He added, “The product that’s licensed is the BioNTech product which is substantially similar but not necessarily identical. It’s called Comirnaty… and it’s not yet available. They haven’t started manufacturing it or labeling it and that’s the one that the liability waiver will no longer apply.”

“So the one that’s actually licensed is not yet available and when it does become available it will no longer have the liability shield.”

Dr. Malone has previously warned that Americans have not been provided with enough information to decide whether or not to take the chances on getting the experimental COVID vaccines. He says we just don’t know if the supposed benefits outweigh the risks.

He believes the government is not being transparent with the American people.

“I am of the opinion that people have the right to decide whether to accept vaccines or not, especially since these are experimental vaccines,” Malone said.

“This is a fundamental right having to do with clinical research ethics,” said Malone. “And so, my concern is that I know that there are risks. But we don’t have access to the data, and the data haven’t been captured rigorously enough so that we can accurately assess those risks.”

“And therefore… we don’t really have the information that we need to make a reasonable decision.”

This is the reason the vaccines were not FDA approved from the beginning although FDA approval does not mean the vaccines are safe and it certainly doesn’t indicate that they’re somehow safer now than before the “approval.”

Nonetheless, at least the FDA previously acknowledged that there wasn’t enough information and data on the vaccines to give them approval.

Acting FDA commissioner Janet Woodcock said the FDA “approval” “may now instill additional confidence to get vaccinated.”

The FDA is claiming, however, that the now-approved vaccine is the same as the one previously under EUA. Why on earth would the millions of Americans who have thus refused the shots suddenly be persuaded to get the shots because of some arbitrary “FDA approval?”

Dr. Malone, however, says the vaccines are similar but not the same.

Thanks to contradictory information by the FDA it’s hard to know if the shots are the same or if they’re different but one thing remains true, the shots are not “vaccines” and do nothing to stop the spread of COVID.

They’re also dangerous and come with some pretty serious side effects. Americans are free to choose whether or not to take their chances on these dangerous drugs but the time is fast-approaching when the radical left’s patience for our freedom to choose is disappearing.

How much longer until they come knocking on our doors?

Copyright 2021.

You may also like...


  1. I read the full letter of approval. What are the implications of this statment?

    Page 2 – STN BL 125742/0 – Elisa Harkins
    You may label your product…… “We did not refer your application to the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee because our review of information submitted in your BLA, including the clinical study design and trial results did not raise concerns or controversial issues that would have benefited from an advisory committee discussion”

  2. About Advisory Committees
    The FDA uses committees and panels to obtain independent expert advice on scientific, technical, and policy matters. FDA seeks to include the views of women and men, members of all racial and ethnic groups, and individuals with and without disabilities on its advisory committees and, therefore, encourages nominations of appropriately qualified candidates from these groups.

    iS THERE REALLY NOTHING ABOUT mRNA VACCINES THAT ARE CONCERNING. Are these folks just cry babies relaiting unsceintifaly proven stories. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)

  3. They already have started knocking on doors. My pregnant daughter in law reported a Planned Parenthood worker came to her door to ask if she was vaccinated. This was in St. Paul, MN. So, the abortion provider is promoting the abortion derived and/or tested on aborted cells gene therapy. If you ask for the ingredients, they have no information to offer you. So much for informed consent.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here